Skip to main content

SADC Protocol on Trade in Services operational




Hosia Mviringi


Southern African Development Community  Protocol on Trade in Services has entered into force following the deposit of ratification instruments by two thirds of the Member States.


This was announced by the block's Executive Secretary, His Excellency, Mr Elias M. Magosi in a notification to the 16 Member States.


"I have the honour and pleasure to inform member states that the Protocol on Trade in Services entered into force on January 13, 2022," said Mr Magosi.


According to Article 30 of the SADC Protocol on Trade in Services provides that the Protocol shall enter into force 30 days after the deposit of ratification instruments by a simple majority of member States of not less than two thirds.


So far eleven SADC Member States have ratified the Protocol, paving the way for it's adoption by the economic block.


Zimbabwe is among the eleven countries that have ascended to the Protocol that will facilitate trade in services across the region.


The Protocol will be key in facilitating increased intra-regional trade among member states as services and finished products move to boost country GDP of exporting countries while facilitating knowledge transfer between member states.


Through a preferential trade agreement that covers all commercial tradable services in all sectors, the Protocol is geared towards gradual removal of hitherto cumbersome regulations which have hindered regional inter-state supply of services within the SADC region.


Most countries in the region had maintained laws that hinder trade in services through such sectors as banking and insurance, and transport where strict measures were in place that hinder the ability of foreign services suppliers to trade freely across the border.


Such measures have had the natural economic impact that adversely limit the movement of service resources from one country to the other.

In such countries as South Africa and Zambia have been found wanting when transport unions in those countries have consistently harassed Zimbabwean transporters, to some extent causing loss of property and injury or death of truck drivers.


This is one area that the SADC Protocol on Trade in Services is envisaged to address.

Trade in services can not be divorced from trade in manufactured goods as such services as transportation are key in the efficient delivery of goods to destination markets.


"The Protocol offsets the general and specific obligations binding the ratifying or acceding Member States (State Parties) to grant each other preferential market access and non-discriminatory(" national") treatment for SADC service suppliers," said SADC Secretariat in a statement.


"The State Parties guarantee to extend to all SADC State Parties the best conditions for trade that they grant to one SADC State Party or a non- State Party, including non-SADC countries".


The first round of negotiations was concluded in 2019 and these covered communication, financial, tourism, transport, construction, and energy related services.


SADC Trade Ministers then concluded the second round of negotiations in 2021 and this round covered such sticky areas as business services, distribution, education and training, health and social services, recreational, cultural and sporting services.


The operationalisation of the Protocol is one giant step by the Southern African regional block towards fostering regional cohesion and economic cooperation.

This in turn has the wider impact the regional GDP which is set to be boosted by the expected wider access to a bigger regional market by member states.


As at 2018 SADC commanded a total population of 345 million and a whooping US$721 billion GDP economy from which State Parties are expected to tap from.


Countries that are yet to ratify the Protocol include Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar, and the United Republic of Tanzania, plus the Union of Comoros.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

After 23 years, UK-ZIM relations thawing

 #SundayMussings  Prof. Jonathan Moyo It's International Relations 101 that a penchant for and infatuation with trivialities is not part of diplomacy, it's trivial pursuit. With this in mind, one does not have to hold a brief for anyone to understand that the coronation of King Charles III was essentially a showcase of an archaic and obnoxious tradition of hereditary rule - frowned upon in most parts of the world now under republican rule of one sort or another, while still a big deal in the United Kingdom of once upon a time, Great Britain - that dates back some 1,000 years ago. There’s therefore nothing geopolitically significant or even interesting about that primitive culture, where someone called Charles was crowned head of state by virtue of his birth at a ceremony where "His Majesty's Government" had no qualms about displaying the full repertoire of imperial loot like the stolen African Star and majestic gold from former British colonies, many of whose lead...

In defence of Lindiwe Sisulu - SA Constitution not Sacred, Judges not demi-gods

            Professor Arthur Mutambara The SA Constitution is not Sacred and SA Judges are not Demigods.   By Arthur Guseni Oliver Mutambara 13 January 2022   Minister Lindiwe Sisulu penned an opinion piece on 7 January 2022 titled: ‘Hi Mzansi, have we seen justice?’  It was quite a refreshing critique of the challenges confronting South Africa.  Sisulu’s right to express herself and the content of her remarks must be vigorously defended without equivocation or ambiguity. On 8 January 2022, soon after I read the opinion piece, I publicly expressed the following remarks: ‘Wow, what a piece by Lindiwe Sisulu. I am pleasantly surprised that some in the ANC still get it and are prepared to articulate it eloquently. The issue is how to get such incisive thinking to influence the ANC and the country's direction. Is it a lost cause?’ I stand by these utterances. There has been quite several articles and remarks attacking Minister Sisulu. The ba...
LAWYERS DEMO : DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OR PROTECTING THE CASH COW ?   By Hosia Mviringi 31 January 2019 On 29 January 2019 the nation woke up to the news that Lawyers under the banner of the Law Society of Zimbabwe was demonstrating against lack of or misdelivery of justice in the Courts in Zimbabwe. I write this article with a heavy heart knowing that my brother is a loyal member of the fraternity.I will try to be professional and speak my mind. What baffles the mind is the fact that the Lawyers are officers of the same Courts which they have served under the Law Society of Zimbabwe in defence of the accused for many years since independence.They have not seen this so called misdelivery of justice until only yesterday after the violent demonstration of the 14th of January 2019. What has changed now to warrant the demonstration by the Lawyers against the same Courts to which they have served or are serving as officers and partners ? Lets try to unpack the conundrum. Soon...